Our Impact

Trapped By Design: How Predatory Lenders Exploit Black Atlanta

Introduction

Installment lenders, title lenders and rent-to-own companies – also known as predatory institutions – maintain a strong grasp on Atlanta’s predominantly-Black neighborhoods. These businesses trap residents in cycles of debt by offering financial products and services that are difficult to escape. By targeting Black residents with high-interest loans and substandard products, these institutions extract wealth from communities already facing systemic injustice.

We still are committed to activating shared prosperity for all Black people throughout the South.

Our Impact Since 2018

$3.3M+ in strategic partnerships, grants, loans & technical assistance.

$86M+ leveraged & influenced for the Atlanta community economic development and small business ecosystem.

Our complete audit is publicly available for review on our Financial Information page at kindredfutures.org/ and our 990 by request.

Our Impact In 2025: BUILD — Strategy + Impact

Cooperative Development & Shared Ownership: $5.83M deployed through a shared capital framework via a formalized Collective Capital Deployment Agreement with CDFI partners. Advanced a shared-ownership strategy in Savannah by supporting the planning and design of a cooperative business service model for shared services, revenue generation, and collective bargaining.

Small Business Ecosystem Development: $250K leveraged through Project Equity’s Employee Ownership Catalyst Fund, supporting $50K–$75K loans for businesses preparing for employee ownership transitions. Developed an Archetype Framework establishing a process to identify archetypes that define how Kindred will work with Business Serving Organizations (BSOs) based on their demonstrated ability to deliver results.

Capital Aggregation & Alignment: $136K+ secured to launch the Small Business Revitalization Grant program, directly supporting Black-owned businesses. $65K+ deployed to youth and early-stage entrepreneurs, driving production expansion, a $50K public-sector contract, and business infrastructure growth.

Commercial Affordability & Anti-Displacement: 40 stakeholders engaged across small businesses, community organizations, policymakers, and developers. 20 formal participation agreements secured, establishing a committed, equitable development consortium. $150K–$500K in developer incentives launched to create below-market commercial space along the BeltLine. Moved from research to action, building on prior affordability analysis to launch the BeltLine Commercial Affordability Consortium (BCAC) and address commercial displacement.

Our Impact In 2025: LEAD — Policy + Research

Reports & Briefs: In January, we released Trapped by Design: How Predatory Lenders Exploit Black Atlanta, which explores the disproportionate clustering of predatory lenders in majority-Black neighborhoods and the compounding economic harm on residents. Midyear, Securing Georgia’s Future: How Baby Bonds Can Build Wealth and Transform Communities was published, revealing how a state-level baby bonds policy could transform economic outcomes for children across Georgia, especially in rural and low-wealth communities. In August, we released Roots of Wealth: Unearthing Black Prosperity in the South, examining the historical and structural drivers of the racial wealth divide.

Policy Map & Tools: In 2025, we launched two interactive tools to help users extend our research in ways that matter to their communities. This includes the Mapping Black Wealth Pathways Toolkit with PolicyMap and the Roots of Wealth Dashboard with The Data Center. Experience them at kindredfutures.org/reports.

A Message From Our CEO

2025 Annual Report

Letter From Our CEO

Partners, Community, and Co-Conspirators in Justice, there are moments when the path forward is shaped not by precedent, but by conviction. 2025 was such a year. Amid growing hostility toward race-explicit work, Black-led organizations—despite their impact—were once again asked to do more with less. The gap between rhetoric and resource remains one of the greatest barriers to justice.

At Kindred Futures, we refused to accept that gap as inevitable. We moved with a spirit of joyous rebellion—a disciplined commitment to build, imagine, and advance even in constrained conditions. We held fast to our north star: supporting 2 million Black households across the Deep South with zero or negative net worth.

Across our ecosystem, we saw not just resilience, but innovation—leaders reimagining capital, ownership, and systems never designed for them. This is where Kindred stands: at the intersection of what exists and what is possible.

By 2025, cumulatively, we helped mobilize more than $86 million in capital to historically disinvested communities and invested $3.3 million into partners driving community-rooted solutions. Through efforts like the Roots of Wealth Report and the Mapping Black Wealth Pathways platform, we are expanding how data, strategy, and imagination work together to unlock real pathways to prosperity.

We also evolved how we lead—launching our Organizational Compass, a dynamic framework that allows us to remain focused, adaptive, and grounded in impact in an unpredictable environment. Because resilience is not enough. What this moment demands is durability—systems that build, sustain, and transfer wealth across generations.

But let us be clear: this future will not emerge without a shift in how capital moves. The continued underinvestment in Black-led organizations is not a question of capacity—it is a matter of misalignment. And correcting that misalignment is essential.

There is no guidebook for this moment. But there is a call—to align around shared results, to move beyond performative commitment, and to invest with courage and intention.

Kindred Futures will continue to answer that call. We invite you to do the same.

As Dr. King reminded us, “Philanthropy is commendable, but it must not cause the philanthropist to overlook the circumstances of economic injustice which make philanthropy necessary.”

The circumstances are clear.
The work is underway.
The question is whether we will meet it—together.

Janelle Williams, Ph.D., CEO

Resilience is Not Enough

There are moments when the path forward is shaped not by precedent, but by conviction. 2025 was such a year. Amid growing hostility toward race-explicit work, Black-led organizations—despite their impact—were once again asked to do more with less. The gap between rhetoric and resource remains one of the greatest barriers to justice.

At Kindred Futures, we refused to accept that gap as inevitable. We moved with a spirit of joyous rebellion—a disciplined commitment to build, imagine, and advance even in constrained conditions. We held fast to our north star: supporting 2 million Black households across the Deep South with zero or negative net worth.

Across our ecosystem, we saw not just resilience, but innovation—leaders reimagining capital, ownership, and systems never designed for them. This is where Kindred stands: at the intersection of what exists and what is possible.

Today, we released our 2025 Annual Report — a comprehensive look at our work last year and the mission-aligned partners and organizations that stood with us. From milestones to momentum — explore our Report and discover the story behind our year here.

Atlanta’s growth must not come at the expense of the people who built It

By Janelle Williams, Ph.D. and Ryan Wilson

Atlanta is a region I love deeply and have been proud to call home for almost 20 years. Every time the wheels touch down, and I see the skyline rise into view, I feel the exhale of returning to a place that has loved me, stretched me, bloomed me and challenged me to become braver and stronger.

It is precisely because I love Atlanta that I have dedicated my career to serving her people and places — especially those stubbornly excluded from economic opportunity.

Nearly 15 years ago, I began writing about and challenging our public, private, philanthropic and civic sectors to confront Atlanta’s racialized I-20 divide. Fast forward to today, and the maps look painfully familiar. The clusters of exclusion may be more pronounced, the language more sophisticated, the skyline more crowded with cranes. But the people behind the numbers — their stories, legacies, hopes and vulnerabilities — remain unflinchingly similar.

Atlanta is one of the great economic anchors of the American South. We are home to the world’s busiest airport. We attract Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 companies. We are a logistics hub, a cultural capital, a civil rights landmark, a destination for Black ambition and a place that continues to shape the region’s future. But growth is not the same as shared prosperity.

Read the full in the Saport Report.

Taking Root in Savannah: Investing in the Design of Collective Ownership

By Kim Addie 

 

At GSBCC, we believe strong businesses build strong communities. This investment has allowed us to move the work forward in a way that is strategic, sustainable, and rooted in real impact for Savannah area.”

Moncello Stewart, President, CEO

Greater Savannah Black Chamber of Commerce

 

Why Savannah

Savannah is a city rich with Black enterprise, cultural leadership, and entrepreneurial ambition. With a majority-Black population at 54% and generations of business ownership embedded in its neighborhoods, corridors, and creative economy, Savannah holds deep community-rooted capacity for wealth creation and collective growth. Black entrepreneurs are already shaping the city’s tourism, service, logistics, and cultural sectors—contributing to its identity and economic vitality.

At the same time, public data reflects persistent gaps in capital access, contracting participation, and asset accumulation that limit the full realization of that potential. While more than half of Savannah’s residents are African American, Black-owned businesses account for a smaller share of firms with scale, and White-owned businesses are worth nearly 16 times more than Black-owned businesses. Additionally, 22% of city residents live in income poverty, and 35.5% of households are asset-poor, meaning more than one in three families lack sufficient net worth to withstand economic disruption. These disparities do not reflect a lack of ambition or enterprise; rather, they signal structural barriers that constrain the ability of Black-owned businesses to convert market presence into long-term generational wealth.

For Kindred Futures, Savannah became a powerful opportunity to invest in the design of an ecosystem that matches the city’s existing leadership and entrepreneurial strength—aligning squarely with advancing its R3 framework—expanding Revenue pathways through cooperative enterprise, strengthening Resilience through shared infrastructure and institutional capacity, and advancing Repair by addressing the structural barriers that have historically limited Black wealth accumulation across the South.

Rather than leading with capital to businesses alone, Kindred’s approach in Savannah focused on investing in backbone institutions: organizations trusted by Black entrepreneurs, embedded in community, and positioned to coordinate long-term wealth-building strategies. They serve as pivotal intermediaries that leverage expertise, relationships, and convening power to equip Black entrepreneurs with the knowledge, connections, and resources needed to access capital and build ventures.  

These ecosystem dynamics are reflected in the lived experiences of Savannah entrepreneurs. One local business owner described turning to entrepreneurship after realizing how quickly traditional income streams could disappear. Despite an advanced degree and years of experience in nonprofit and contract work, she wanted to build something she could control—something that could not be taken away by shifting contracts or institutional decisions. What began as a small creative project quickly grew into a business. After customizing a jacket with patches and receiving strong interest from others, she began selling products online and at local pop-up events. Over time, the venture expanded from a home-based operation to vendor tables, then to retail space, eventually becoming a storefront at Oglethorpe Mall. Reflecting on that journey, she described the growth process simply: “From my home to one table, two tables, three tables—it kind of unfolded that way.”

Yet her experience also reflects the structural challenges facing many Black-owned businesses in Savannah. While she sees enormous potential in the city, she describes the local business landscape as difficult to navigate, noting that “Savannah’s pretty tricky. You have to get in. It’s like a click, and you have to get in first.” Access to capital, trusted mentorship, and credible business support remain persistent barriers, and programs that promise support do not always deliver the guidance entrepreneurs need to scale.

Like many small business owners, she is thinking beyond survival toward long-term growth. Her goal is to franchise the business into cities such as Atlanta, Jacksonville, and Charleston. Achieving that vision, she argues, requires more than workshops or short-term programs—it requires sustained mentorship, shared services, and trusted ecosystem partners who can help businesses navigate contracts, procurement opportunities, and scaling pathways.

Her perspective also raises a broader question about Savannah’s economic future. If the city’s investments and growth were more intentionally connected to local Black businesses, she believes the impact could be transformative—not only for individual firms, but for households, generational wealth, and the long-term economic health of the community.

This approach is especially relevant given Savannah’s broader economic context. Over the past two years, the State of Georgia—through the Georgia Ports Authority and with public leadership from Governor Brian Kemp—has advanced a series of major port-related investments and approvals that underscore Savannah’s role as a global trade gateway:

Savannah’s role as a global trade gateway:

  • $4.5 billionmulti-year port investment program announced and advanced in recent years to expand berth capacity, container yards, rail connections, and logistics infrastructure at the Ports of Savannah and Brunswick.
  • More than $65 million in capital approvals in 2024 alonefor container yard and terminal improvements at Savannah’s Ocean Terminal, increasing near-term capacity and long-term throughput.
  • Record and near-record port activity, with the Port of Savannah reporting one of its busiest years on record in FY2024–FY2025, reinforcing its central rolein statewide economic growth, freight movement, and job creation.

While these investments are accelerating regional growth, Black-owned businesses have largely remained disconnected from port-related procurement, supply chains, and contracting opportunities—reinforcing the need for coordinated, Black-led ecosystem infrastructure that links ownership, enterprise development, and access to large-scale economic engines. Over the past several years, the State of Georgia and the Georgia Ports Authority have advanced more than $4 billion in port and logistics expansion. Yet the last publicly available local disparity data—most notably the 2016 City of Savannah Disparity Study—documented persistent underutilization of African American-owned firms as prime contractors in major public contracting pipelines. 

Similarly, transportation and infrastructure projects tied to port growth operate under Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation targets that typically range between approximately 10–15%, establishing minimum inclusion benchmarks rather than demonstrating proportional participation reflective of Savannah’s Majority-Black population. Public procurement reporting does not clearly demonstrate sustained or scaled participation by Black-owned businesses in port-adjacent supply chains. This disconnect between multi-billion-dollar public investment and transparent; proportional contracting outcomes reinforces the need for coordinated ecosystem strategies that link local ownership to large-scale economic engines.

Phase I: Seeding Ecosystem Infrastructure (Step Up Savannah – Ignite Advantage)

Kindred’s earliest investment in Savannah flowed through Step Up Savannah, supported via the Atlanta Wealth Building Initiative (AWBI). This initial $25,000 planning investment was intentionally catalytic—not programmatic. Rather than funding a discrete set of services or a short-term program cycle, the investment supported ecosystem design, stakeholder alignment, and cooperative infrastructure development—laying the groundwork for institutional change and future capital alignment.

The goal of this investment was to test whether Savannah could support the launch of a cooperative business service model capable of:

  • Incubating and stabilizing small Black-owned businesses
  • Creating shared services, revenue generation, and collective bargaining power
  • Laying the groundwork for shared and employee ownership pathways

This phase centered on design, alignment, and ecosystem trust-building. Step Up Savannah convened directly impacted stakeholders, mapped gaps in the local small-business support landscape and began co-designing a model rooted in shared ownership rather than fragmented services.

What Kindred learned: Early, flexible planning capital is essential for ecosystem actors to move from vision to structure—especially in markets where organizations are already stretched thin. 

 

From Concept to Cooperative Infrastructure (IgniteAdvantage)

As Step Up Savannah’s ecosystem planning matured, the work moved from concept to formal cooperative infrastructure. This effort, publicly launched as IgniteAdvantage Savannah, translated years of listening sessions, steering committee work, and cross-sector design into a legally structured, member-owned shared services cooperative.

 IgniteAdvantage was conceived by Dr. Alicia Johnson—now serving as a Public Service Commissioner for the State of Georgia—and designed as a Minority-Owned Business Service Cooperative, anchored by the Greater Savannah Black Chamber of Commerce (GSBCC) and governed according to cooperative principles of democratic ownership, equitable participation, and community benefit. As a member-owned shared services cooperative, the enterprise is collectively owned by participating businesses—each with a voice in governance—and structured to pool resources for mutual benefit. Rather than operating as a traditional business incubator or grant program, the cooperative enables members to share back-office services (such as accounting, marketing, administrative support, and benefits), aggregate purchasing power, pursue joint contracting opportunities, and reinvest earnings in proportion to member participation. Its model focuses on lowering the cost of doing business for minority-owned firms by creating a shared administrative infrastructure, while increasing access to capital and, contracts. For example, by aggregating member demand, the cooperative can negotiate group health insurance, accounting, and marketing services at reduced rates—freeing up working capital for reinvestment. 

At the same time, the cooperative structure enables members to pursue larger public or private contracts collectively (rather than small, standalone firms), strengthening their ability to meet bonding, insurance, and capacity requirements. By presenting coordinated financial records and shared back-office systems, member businesses are also better positioned to demonstrate creditworthiness to CDFIs and lending partners, improving access to non-extractive or growth capital that might otherwise be out of reach.

This work gained broader public visibility through local media coverage highlighting the cooperative’s goal of breaking cycles of poverty by strengthening minority-owned businesses through shared ownership and collaboration—framing IgniteAdvantage not as a single program, but as long-term economic infrastructure for Savannah’s Black business community. 

What Kindred learned: Cooperative development requires capital, legal and governance support, durable institutions, and trusted local anchors. Ecosystem investments pay off when ideas are allowed to mature into durable institutions. 

Strengthening the Anchor Institution – GSBCC

With cooperative infrastructure underway, Kindred Futures deepened its Savannah investment by making a $25,000 catalytic capacity investment in the GSBCC through AWBI—recognizing the GSBCC as the ecosystem’s primary anchor and scaling vehicle. This investment was explicitly designed to strengthen organizational backbone capacity, not fund a single program. Funds supported administrative staffing, systems, communications, and data infrastructure—enabling the GSBCC to move from event-based engagement to sustained ecosystem leadership. A second investment  of $40,000 funded a project manager to operationalize the cooperative—engaging businesses, coordinating partners, and activating contract opportunities.

Catalytic Impact of the Investments to date:

  • $25K flexible investment unlocked $150K+ in public sectorand coalition funding, stabilizing cooperative technical assistance, shared-services infrastructure, and business support activities during reimbursement-based funding cycles.
  • 31% growth in partnershipswith local, state, and nonprofit actors, positioning the GSBCC as a trusted intermediary across sectors.
  • 361% increase in social media reachand 142% growth in website engagement, dramatically expanding visibility for Black-owned businesses.
  • Expanded flagship convenings (EmpowHer, Black Business Expo, Black Excellence Gala), reaching thousands of attendees and vendorsand driving stronger B2B and B2C connections.
  • Secured $136,000+to launch the Small Business Revitalization Grant program, directly supporting Black-owned businesses.

As anchor institution, GSBCC also plays a formal governance role—helping translate cooperative principles into practice while maintaining trust with hundreds of Black-owned businesses citywide.

What Kindred learned: When modest, flexible funding is invested in trusted local institutions, it can generate impact far beyond its dollar amount—unlocking new capital, strengthening partnerships, and building long-term community power when paired with cooperative and shared ownership strategies. 

Kindred’s Savannah investments function as a place-based proof point within BUILD’s broader Southern strategy:

  • Demonstrating how modest, flexible investments can unlock significant leverage
  • Showing how cooperative and shared-ownership pathways must be paired with strong BSOs (Business Support Organizations—trusted intermediaries that provide technical assistance, capital navigation, conveningpower, and ecosystem coordination for small businesses) to succeed
  • Generating lessons that inform Kindred’s work across Georgia and the broader nine-state Southern region

Savannah is no longer just a local investment—it is part of Kindred Futures’ learning engine for how strengthening ecosystems,   helps build durable Black wealth.

Where the Story Is Now

Today, Kindred’s Savannah work reflects a clear throughline:

  1. Seed the vision(Step Up Savannah)
  2. Stabilize the backbone(GSBCC)
  3. Align toward shared ownership and long-term wealth

This progression—from planning, to capacity, to leverage—mirrors BUILD’s core belief: that repairing and growing Black wealth in the South requires patient, relational, and systems-oriented investment.  

Importantly, the story does not end here. 

The next phase of the work moves from building to execution: expanding strategic partnerships with the City of Savannah to advance cooperative and shared-ownership contracting as a proof point; identifying policy levers that strengthen the enabling conditions for cooperative models; and leveraging existing regional relationships—such as with the Georgia Cooperative Development Center and allied practitioners—to scale implementation, institutionalize shared ownership, and translate ecosystem design into durable economic outcomes. Savannah stands as an early chapter in that story—and a foundation for what comes next.

The Promise of Democracy Must Include Power | Statement on the Supreme Court’s Failure to Protect Voting Rights

Our Statement on the Supreme Court’s Failure to Protect Voting Rights

The Supreme Court’s ruling on the Voting Rights Act is disappointing, but not surprising. And as history shows, these decisions consistently and disproportionately shape the realities of the South.

In 1980, one of the earliest challenges to the Voting Rights Act emerged from Alabama in Mobile vs. Bolden, where Black residents petitioned for their voices to count through their vote in a city that was one-third Black, yet had no Black representation. A 6-3 Court opinion held: “The [15th] Amendment does not entail the right to have Negro candidates elected, but prohibits only purposefully discriminatory denial or abridgment by government of the freedom to vote ‘on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.’”

In his dissent, Thurgood Marshall warned of the implications: “A plurality of the Court concludes that, in the absence of proof of intentional discrimination by the State, the right to vote provides the politically powerless with nothing more than the right to cast meaningless ballots.”

Taken together, the message was clear: the right to representation of our cultures is not enshrined in the Constitution. We are free to participate in democracy, but participation does not guarantee outcomes, equity, or an equal share of power.

And now, in 2026, amid continued challenges to race-based equity practices, the majority opinion again asserts (as it did in 2013 in Shelby vs Holder):

“(V)ast social change has occurred throughout the country and particularly in the South… As this Court has recognized, ‘things have changed dramatically’ in the decades since the passage of the Voting Rights Act.”

But the lived reality tells a more complicated story. Change has not been nearly as drastic —or as Just — as suggested, and the trajectory for Black communities in the South remains precarious. 

This moment demands action. We must actively engage in defending and preserving democratic principles, particularly fighting for voting rights amidst challenges to the democratic process. We must organize locally, support civic infrastructure, and hold institutions accountable. The promise of democracy must be more than unrepresented participation, it must include power.

The FY2027 Budget Request: A Blueprint for Widening the Racial Wealth Divide

By Alex Camardelle, Ph.D.

In April 2026, the White House released its fiscal year 2027 budget request, a document that doubles down on the fiscal trajectory set by the Working Families Tax Cut Act signed into law on July 4, 2025. While the budget’s authors frame it as a plan to “right our fiscal ship,” a close reading reveals something far more consequential: a systematic dismantling of the federal programs, agencies, and employment pathways that Black families and families of color have relied upon to build economic stability for generations. For advocates working to close the racial wealth divide, this budget proposal is a policy roadmap that, if enacted, would accelerate wealth extraction from the communities least positioned to absorb it.

The Starting Line Is Already Unequal

Any honest assessment of this budget must begin with the baseline reality it ignores. White households hold over 83 percent of total national wealth in the United States, despite representing 68 percent of the population. Black and Hispanic households each hold a fraction of that share. These disparities are the compounding result of decades of policy choices around housing, education, employment, and the social safety net.

The FY2027 budget does not acknowledge this context. It does not contain a single analysis of how its proposals would affect communities across racial or economic lines. Instead, it treats equity-focused programming as inherently wasteful, systematically targeting for elimination the very agencies and initiatives designed to address structural disparities.

Gutting the Safety Net: Medicaid and SNAP

The budget builds on the Working Families Tax Cut Act (also known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill”), which slashed an estimated $1 trillion from Medicaid and hundreds of billions from SNAP over the next decade. Beginning in 2027, Medicaid expansion beneficiaries face new work requirements mandating at least 20 hours per week of work, school, or community engagement. Congressional Budget Office estimates project that millions of people stand to lose health coverage, while millions more could lose some or all of their food assistance as a result of new eligibility restrictions.

These cuts land hardest on communities of color. Workers of color are overrepresented among low-income households due to structural inequities in wages and employment access. In 2023, more than one in five Black households (23.3%) and Hispanic households (21.9%) experienced food insecurity, more than double the rate of white households (9.9%). Approximately 25 percent of Black Americans receive SNAP benefits, and about 46 percent of all SNAP recipients are people of color. Each dollar cut from these programs is a dollar that would have otherwise freed family resources for savings, education, or the down payment on a first home.

The budget also proposes eliminating the $4 billion Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and the $775 million Community Services Block Grant, both of which disproportionately serve Black and Latino households. These are not abstractions. They are the programs that keep the heat on in winter and connect families to job training and financial literacy services.

Dismantling Pathways to Black Middle-Class Stability

Federal employment has long served as one of the most reliable engines of Black economic mobility in America. Black workers represent 18.7 percent of the federal workforce, significantly above their 13 percent share of the general population. In states across the South, the numbers are even more striking: Black workers make up 43.8 percent of federal employees in Georgia, 37.6 percent in Louisiana, and 34.8 percent in Mississippi.

Housing: Pulling the Ladder Up

Housing is the primary vehicle through which American families build wealth, and the homeownership divide remains one of the starkest markers of racial inequality. Roughly 74 percent of white households own their homes compared to about 45 percent of Black households. Rather than addressing this divide, the FY2027 budget proposes to widen it.

The budget cuts HUD by 13 percent, a $10.7 billion reduction, and proposes eliminating some of the department’s most consequential programs. The Community Development Block Grant, a $3.3 billion program that has funded affordable housing and community infrastructure in underserved neighborhoods for decades, is proposed for elimination. The HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which provides $1.3 billion for affordable housing construction and rehabilitation, is slated for termination. The budget also eliminates Pathways to Removing Obstacles (PRO) Housing grants, the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program, and Native American housing programs.

The budget frames these cuts as eliminating “woke” spending. But what it labels ideological are programs that cities have used to address displacement in gentrifying neighborhoods, invest in energy-efficient affordable housing, and connect historically marginalized communities with stable shelter. The elimination of CDBG alone would remove a critical funding stream for economic development in majority-Black and majority-Latino census tracts nationwide.

Targeting Equity Infrastructure by Name

Perhaps the most revealing feature of this budget is what it eliminates by name. The Minority Business Development Agency, the only federal agency dedicated to the growth of minority-owned businesses, is proposed for termination with a $47 million cut. The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities at NIH is slated for elimination. Minority-Serving Institution programs at the Department of Education face a $354 million cut. The Digital Equity program, a $2.2 billion initiative to close the digital divide in communities of color, has been cancelled.

The budget does not merely cut equity programs. It characterizes their core missions as unconstitutional, discriminatory, or fraudulent. This framing matters because it does not just defund current initiatives; it delegitimizes the very premise that the federal government has a role in addressing racial economic disparities. It sends a clear signal that future administrations would need to rebuild not just funding levels but the legal and political justification for equity-oriented policy itself.

Who Benefits? Follow the Money

While these cuts strip resources from low-income families and communities of color, the budget’s fiscal posture reflects the tax architecture of the Working Families Tax Cut Act, which delivered an estimated $1 trillion in tax reductions overwhelmingly benefiting the wealthiest one percent of households and corporations. The contrast is stark: a budget that finds hundreds of billions in savings by cutting food assistance for hungry families while extending tax provisions that primarily benefit households with seven-figure incomes.

The racial dimension of this tradeoff is impossible to ignore. Nine out of ten households with wealth above the estate tax threshold are white. The families gaining the most from the WFTCA’s tax provisions are overwhelmingly white and already wealthy. The families losing the most from its spending cuts are disproportionately Black, Latino, and Indigenous. This is not a budget that asks everyone to sacrifice equally. It is a transfer of resources from those who have the least to those who have the most, superimposed on an already vast racial wealth divide.

A Call to Action for Advocates

For policy advocates, the FY2027 budget is a clarifying document. It makes explicit what the past year of executive action has implied: that this administration views racial equity programming not as a policy priority but as a policy problem to be solved through elimination.

The response must be equally clear. Advocates should push Congress to reject the proposed eliminations of CDBG, HOME, MBDA, and LIHEAP. State-level coalitions should prepare contingency plans for the millions who will lose Medicaid and SNAP coverage under the new work requirements. Legal organizations should challenge the constitutional arguments being used to dismantle Minority-Serving Institution funding. And every organization working on the racial wealth divide should be communicating to the public, in concrete terms, what these budget numbers mean for real families.

The racial wealth divide did not emerge by accident, and it will not close through indifference. If this budget moves forward as written, the distance between Black and white wealth in America will not merely persist. It will grow.

The only thing of note that I would reconsider through the text is contained here – the notion that this administration should utilize a racialized context when building out their policy agenda.

An IG Live on Commercial Affordability

Black Wealth Unlocked

S3: Episode 2

An IG Live On Commercial Affordability

About The Episode

There are seven Black-owned small businesses for every 1,000 Black residents in the City of Atlanta. But as rents in the city continue to rise, commercial affordability continues to be a hurdle for small business owners.

Join Kindred’s Dr. Joseph-Emery Kouaho and Ashley Causey-Golden, the creator of Afrocentric Montessori and co-founder of Gather Forest School for perspective and strategy on the ground.

More From The Series

Inside The Report: A Beloved Community, A Brighter Tomorrow​

Black Wealth Unlocked

S3: Episode 1

Inside The Report: A Beloved Community, A Brighter Tomorrow

About The Episode

Join Kindred Futures team members Joseph-Emery Kouaho, Ph.D., and Joni-Leigh Webster, Ph.D., as they discuss our newest report, A Beloved Community, A Brighter Tomorrow: A Call for Climate Resilience to Safeguard Wealth in the City of Atlanta. This report explores how the freedom to live in climate-resilient communities is essential for the economic prosperity and well-being of communities in the City of Atlanta. 

Data suggests Black households need to spend 43% more of their income on energy bills than White households to cool their homes. 

Dr. Joseph-Emery Kouaho and Dr. Joni-Leigh Webster will provide perspectives from Atlanta residents, insights on the report’s findings, and recommendations to help communities safeguard assets and ensure our beloved community sees a brighter tomorrow. 

Download the report at any time at kindredfutures.org/basc

More From The Series

Why the South Matters

Black Wealth Unlocked

S2: Episode 3

Why the South Matters

About The Episode

“Nobody has poverty on their vision board”, Health and Human Services leader Dr Alicia M. Johnson states on this episode of Black Wealth Unlocked. Yet we still find ourselves in a society with Black people experiencing poverty at a much higher rate than the white population, and they’re passing that poverty down to their children. So in this episode, host Dr Janelle Williams talks with Dr Alicia M. Johnson and economic justice activist Jessica Norwood about where Black poverty comes from and what we can and should do to prevent it.

Jessica tells her story of growing up poor in Alabama and shares her observations on how Black people are excluded from the virtuous circle of intergenerational wealth. The conversation turns to how historic segregation impacts society today, particularly in the southern United States, and how the examples of Black exceptionalism can hold back Black advancement. Listen out for the guests’ thoughts on reparations and how community-based wealth creation models could help tackle racial poverty.

Despite discussing poverty, inequality and racism, this episode of Black Wealth Unlocked is still uplifting and joyful, as you’ll hear in the guests’ final thoughts.

More From The Series