Barriers To Completing Weatherization in Atlanta Homes: Cost And Control
Although grants from privately or locally funded organizations provide property owners some support to make changes protecting them from climate and environmental burdens, top barriers preventing them from investing in weatherization include cost, inability to make repairs themselves, lack of information, ineligibility for programs, and uncertainty about benefits.
While cost is the largest barrier (56%) to participating in a weatherization program (Figure 12), Atlanta residents frequently cite a lack of information about aid programs, suggesting a need for better and more coordinated marketing of existing programs towards populations who can benefit the most. This may be especially true for senior residents who are wary of strangers because of increased solicitation by fraudulent actors. Even residents who participate in weatherization programs say that it is difficult to understand what is available to them and to differentiate between the types of services they need most as they manage living costs for their households.
Gatekeeping can lead to residents in predominantly Black communities having limited knowledge about climate and environmental burdens, as well as weatherization as a tool to curb utility costs and protect homes from weather-related damage. The need for more information is colored by a history of distrust within these communities. Continuous failures to repair systemic harm often leave residents unwilling to engage with support services, even when those services are accessible for fear that their homes may be taken away. Attention is needed to reimagine the relationship between Southwest Atlanta residents, private companies, and public institutions, so residents can benefit from locally- or corporate-sponsored initiatives. Community resilience centers, which could be integrated in community centers or public libraries, may be a solution for this by providing neighborhood members with a safe environment to gather and interact with one another, and to share important information to reduce fears and build trust with each other and public institutions.24
For renters, not owning property can mean limited or unenforced tenant protections, leaving them vulnerable. Renters experience a more limited ability to address housing concerns without the approval and willingness of property owners who pay for upgrades. Frequently, these upgrades require changes to the physical structure of homes, like insulating walls or upgrading doors and windows. Although some property owners are willing to weatherize homes when shown proof of cost-effectiveness, others are less amenable, deferring costs for upgrades to renters and even showcasing a willingness to displace tenants to increase profit.
The level of negligence disinvested property owners and managers show extends to general upkeep of properties and issues of affordability for renters, as housing costs rise.
Despite this, residents find other ways to push back against the authority of property owners unwilling to make improvements by continually advocating for themselves, being agentic, and researching other resources.